Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 48 total)

  • RE: Partitioning

    Do you have another solution if you have application with two big tables both can benefit a lot from partitioning. We need 14 partitions for each plus regular 5 drives...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Partitioning

    It's ok. I have separate partition function and schema for each table. My concern is that during switch affected disk (we defined separate for each file grup) have two partitions...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Partitioning

    Nice article but I have two partition tables which share the same disks.

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Disconnecting all users

    Thanks guys. I like this first option but I remember I played a little with this scenario 1-2 years ago and after alter database further restores were not possible. I...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Upgrade path from SQL 2000

    We will keep OS on the same level: Windows 2003 SP2.

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Bad Performance on SQL 2005 compared to SQL 2000

    So it seems that replication is very good fallback option as I thought. Any cons?

    Regarding query I have no particular one. I would like to know if there are some...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Bad Performance on SQL 2005 compared to SQL 2000

    Of course testing is urgent but you can't check everything and it will be enough that there will be 1-2 such queries and you end in with 100 % of...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Linked server and named instance on different Port number

    Finally it works. I used ap_addlinkedserver instead of sp_addserver. Strange thing that the last one works fione for default instance but doesn't for named. thanks for help.

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: SQL Server Log file viewer Filter how to exclude?

    Thanks a lot that's enough 🙂

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Select Query on SQL 2005 takes 100 times more than on SQL 2000

    HWID is quite big 886 927 rows. Subquery returns about 300-1000.

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Select Query on SQL 2005 takes 100 times more than on SQL 2000

    ALZDBA (2/28/2008)


    in many cases the [not] exists with a correlated query will outperform a

    left join with the where rightpart-table-column is null because

    a [not] exists is performed using the...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: SSIS Data Flow Transformation stopped

    Regan Galbraith (2/28/2008)


    how many rows do you expect to process? Is 8000 all the data, or is that perhaps just 1 buffer?

    I expect 8680. I've got 8623.

    Regan Galbraith (2/28/2008)

    how...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: lightweight pooling and context switches

    What's PSS?

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Select Query on SQL 2005 takes 100 times more than on SQL 2000

    ALZDBA (2/26/2008)


    - Can you post the ddl (sql2000 and sql2005) ? (tables/indexes/views)

    CREATE TABLE REF_UPD_HWID (

    [HWID1] [int],

    [HWID2] [varchar] (50),

    [status] [char] (1)

    ) ON [PRIMARY]

    GO

    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[HWID](

    [HWID1] [int] IDENTITY(10000,1) NOT NULL,

    [HWID2] [varchar](50) NOT...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

  • RE: Select Query on SQL 2005 takes 100 times more than on SQL 2000

    Sorry I made an mistake. This table is created in the first step of SSIS Package.

    Then in second step I copy data from production to this table. And then runs...

    MCP ID# 1115468 Ceritified Since 1998
    MCP, MCSE, MCP+I, MCSE+I, MCSA,
    MCDBA SQL7.0 SQL 2000, MCTS SQL 2005

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 48 total)