Eric M Russell (10/27/2015)

---

However, if a single column approach is more appropriate, then I still prefer not to use 1 or 0 but rather a character using a less ambiguous...

leroux 56837 (10/23/2015)

---

I suggest it depends on intent. If the intent is that the user must explicitly acknowledge that it is active then I would go for the positive...

The Wizard Of Oz (6/6/2014)

---

ben.norris (6/6/2014)

---

The Wizard Of Oz (6/6/2014)

---

There's no dependance on ordering, so no cheating going on. It's a natural part of MIN() and MAX() functions.

It would be...

The Wizard Of Oz (6/6/2014)

---

There's no dependance on ordering, so no cheating going on. It's a natural part of MIN() and MAX() functions.

It would be strange if someone caught SwePeso...

This relies on A, B and C being ordered rather than some arbitary values that happen to...

craig 81366 (10/30/2012)

---

ben.norris (10/30/2012)

---

Hugo Kornelis (10/30/2012)

---

First: It does. The CREATE TABLE script does not include a NOT NULL constraint, so the columns...

Hugo Kornelis (10/30/2012)

---

First: It does. The CREATE TABLE script does not include a NOT NULL constraint, so the columns are all nullable.

Second:...

An interesting question spoilt by the 3 points of ambiguity.

Salesgoal mistake

The Sales value for easy becomes 100, it is xray that is missing.

It doesn't state that the field is nullable