Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Thanks for the help guys - I went with option 1 in the late hours of last night and rewrote the SQL query to build the correct field name depending...
October 27, 2009 at 11:48 am
#1071371
Thanks for the suggestion Jon - you know how it is, you spend so long looking at something you stop seeing that there's a different solution. I'll try that later...
October 26, 2009 at 5:51 am
#1070625