Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
I'm not sure what you mean by "extragovernmental entity" but this is what CERN themselves say about what they are, and it's certainly not a private company:
"CERN is run by...
June 27, 2012 at 8:08 am
sturner (6/26/2012)
archie flockhart (6/26/2012)
eventually you have to provide a viable service and actually make a profit or you go bankrupt.
Or you need to accept that there are some things...
June 27, 2012 at 3:21 am
jbnv (6/26/2012)
archie flockhart (6/26/2012) And as you're viewing an HTML based page on the Internet, spare a thought for the government-run bodies which pioneered both.
HTML was developed by Tim Berners-Lee...
June 27, 2012 at 2:30 am
eventually you have to provide a viable service and actually make a profit or you go bankrupt.
Or you need to accept that there are some things which are worth...
June 26, 2012 at 11:07 am
That is very different from calculated risk taking and or taking a calculated gamble.
But if you asked anyone at Lehmann at the time they would have told you that...
June 19, 2012 at 10:24 am
The worship of 'risk-takers' seems to me to be based, at least in large part, on "survival bias": pointing at a few lucky people whose risks paid off.
There...
June 19, 2012 at 7:56 am
[ In SQL Server, there are multiple options: should 1/2 be treated as 5.00E-01 (FLOAT) or as 0.5 (DECIMAL)? What about 1/3? Is it 3.33333333333333E-01, or 0.3, 0.33, 0.333, 0.3333,...
May 22, 2012 at 9:51 am
Yes, I can see a reason for having an 'integer division' operation. That doesn't mean it needed to be the default behaviour whenever two integers are divided.
And it isn't as...
May 22, 2012 at 7:42 am
Hugo
You're right that as long as the behaviour is documented we can work with it - too late to change the behaviour now anyway ! - but a choice was...
May 22, 2012 at 3:22 am
I know this is how it does actually work, but does the behaviour not strike people as a bit strange ?
SQL Server is smart enough, when dividing two quantities that...
May 22, 2012 at 2:04 am
It's because of the order of operations: when written this way the UNION happens first and removes duplicates in t2 and t3, then the result is combined with t1...
March 8, 2012 at 1:47 am
Explanation is wrong: you can get multiple rows even if you use UNION in the query.
You can try it using the tables in the question:
select col from #t2
union
select col...
March 8, 2012 at 1:44 am
David.Poole (2/6/2012)
archie flockhart (2/6/2012)
I'd be interested to know what problems require the calculation of a product from each row in a query in this way.Calculating correlation statistics
It's been a long...
February 6, 2012 at 3:22 am
I'd be interested to know what problems require the calculation of a product from each row in a query in this way.
Presumably also, you'd need to be aware of the...
February 6, 2012 at 2:20 am
In the BOL, I still don't see anything that goes beyond "for some reason" as an explanation of why you can't convert an empty string to decimal, while you can...
November 23, 2011 at 4:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)