How to converT a decimal value to a varchar value

  • Hi,

    Iam getting the values from an excel sheet using linked server for the Phone numbers.

    Phone Numbers are like:

    (44) 20 837 837 9999

    (001) 82.837.8349478

    (001) 12.23.34.454.34

    101.020.929.939.931

    Well the problem is that when iam selecting the values from an excelsheet and displaying in the query anlyzer values are not displying as it is even after CAST.

    [SELECT CONVERT(NVARCHAR(100),@VAL) AS VAL]

    Values are displaying like :

    23.78+e

    82.88+e

    Please help me...........

    Thanks,

    Draj

  • Have you tried using IMEX=1 in your driver?

    see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/194124

    Wayne
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
    Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes


    If you can't explain to another person how the code that you're copying from the internet works, then DON'T USE IT on a production system! After all, you will be the one supporting it!
    Links:
    For better assistance in answering your questions
    Performance Problems
    Common date/time routines
    Understanding and Using APPLY Part 1 & Part 2

  • would this be of any help?

    Ref: http://blog.lab49.com/?p=196

    Tips for reading Excel spreadsheets using ADO.NET

    Microsoft ADO.NET provides a handy, if quirky way to access Excel spreadsheets from Windows applications. The idea is to treat spreadsheets like databases, with each worksheet represented as a "table". Worksheets are expected to be in a table-like format with column headings in the first row and rows of data beneath. For example, the following code reads worksheet "foo" from spreadsheet file C:\BAR.XLS into a DataTable:

    DataTable fooData = new DataTable ();

    OleDbConnection dbConnection =

    new OleDbConnection

    (@"Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;"

    + @"Data Source=C:BAR.XLS;"

    + @"Extended Properties=""Excel 8.0;HDR=Yes;""");

    dbConnection.Open ();

    try

    {

    OleDbDataAdapter dbAdapter =

    new OleDbDataAdapter

    ("SELECT * FROM [foo$]", dbConnection);

    dbAdapter.Fill (fooData);

    }

    finally

    {

    dbConnection.Close ();

    }

    If you want to process the data row by row rather than snarfing it into a DataTable, you can do it this way:

    OleDbConnection dbConnection = new OleDbConnection (@"Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:BAR.XLS;Extended Properties=""Excel 8.0;HDR=Yes;""");

    dbConnection.Open ();

    try

    {

    OleDbCommand dbCommand = new OleDbCommand ("SELECT * FROM [foo$]", dbConnection);

    OleDbDataReader dbReader = dbCommand.ExecuteReader ();

    // Say we are interested only in the columns "YearOfBirth" and "Country":

    int yearOfBirthIndex = dbReader.GetOrdinal ("YearOfBirth");

    int countryIndex = dbReader.GetOrdinal ("Country");

    while (dbReader.Read ())

    {

    string yearOfBirth = dbReader.GetValue (yearOfBirthIndex).ToString ();

    string country = dbReader.GetValue (countryIndex).ToString ();

    // ...

    }

    }

    finally

    {

    dbConnection.Close ();

    }

    But what if you don’t know the name of the sheet you want to read? As you can see from the examples, the ADO.NET interface requires you to name the worksheet - but in many cases you just want to read the first worksheet regardless of its name. It would be cool if ADO.NET provided a suitable notation like this:

    // I WISH THIS WORKED

    OleDbCommand dbCommand = new OleDbCommand ("SELECT * FROM [0#]", dbConnection);

    … but it doesn’t. You must tell ADO.NET the specific name of the sheet you want to read. The solution is therefore to read the spreadsheet schema to find out the sheet names, thus reducing the second problem to the first one, like this:

    OleDbConnection dbConnection = new OleDbConnection (@"Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:BAR.XLS;Extended Properties=""Excel 8.0;HDR=Yes;""");

    dbConnection.Open ();

    try

    {

    // Get the name of the first worksheet:

    DataTable dbSchema = dbConnection.GetOleDbSchemaTable (OleDbSchemaGuid.Tables, null);

    if (dbSchema == null || dbSchema.Rows.Count < 1)

    {

    throw new Exception ("Error: Could not determine the name of the first worksheet.");

    }

    string firstSheetName = dbSchema.Rows [0] ["TABLE_NAME"].ToString ();

    // Now we have the table name; proceed as before:

    OleDbCommand dbCommand = new OleDbCommand ("SELECT * FROM [" + firstSheetName + "]", dbConnection);

    OleDbDataReader dbReader = dbCommand.ExecuteReader ();

    // And so on...

    }

    finally

    {

    dbConnection.Close ();

    }

    The main quirk about the ADO.NET interface is how datatypes are handled. (You’ll notice I’ve been carefully avoiding the question of which datatypes are returned when reading the spreadsheet.) Are you ready for this? ADO.NET scans the first 8 rows of data, and based on that guesses the datatype for each column. Then it attempts to coerce all data from that column to that datatype, returning NULL whenever the coercion fails!

    I suppose that makes a twisted kind of sense if you have spent a lot of time working with relational databases, but there are some unfortunate consequences of this design which aren’t obvious at first. For example, say your spreadsheet contains the following columns:

    YearOfBirth CountryPostalCode

    1964 USA10005

    1970 USA10001

    1952 CanadaK2P1R6

    1981 CanadaL3R3R2

    1974 USA10013

    ADO.NET will correctly guess that the YearOfBirth column is numeric, and that the Country column is of type string. But what about the PostalCode column, which contains a mix of numbers and strings? In this case ADO.NET chooses the type based on the majority of the values (with a tie going to numeric). In this example 3 of the 5 postal codes are numeric, so ADO.NET will declare the column to be numeric. Therefore it will attempt to cast each cell to a number, which will fail for the Canadian postal codes - which will therefore come out as NULL values. Ha ha. Isn’t that fun?

    Even more entertaining, there is absolutely no way to make this 100% reliable - although with some pain, you can improve the situation. Here’s what you need to do. First add the "IMEX=1" option to your connection string like this:

    OleDbConnection dbConnection = new OleDbConnection (@"Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:BAR.XLS;Extended Properties=""Excel 8.0;HDR=Yes;IMEX=1;""");

    That tells ADO.NET to honor the following registry key when reading the spreadsheet:

    Hkey_Local_Machine/Software/Microsoft/Jet/4.0/Engines/Excel/ImportMixedTypes

    This registry key tells ADO.NET what to do when it encounters mixed types in the first 8 rows. It can either be set to the string "Majority Type" (for the default behavior) or to "Text" (which forces the column to be of type string). Note that you are still screwed if the first 8 postal codes are numeric and the 9th is Canadian. (Not to mention that the "Text" option invokes handling that fails on strings over 255 characters, but let’s skip that for now.)

    There’s also a second relevant registry setting (which is honored regardless of the IMEX option):

    Hkey_Local_Machine/Software/Microsoft/Jet/4.0/Engines/Excel/TypeGuessRows

    That says how many rows to scan to guess the datatype. The default is 8, but you can set it anywhere from 0-16 decimal (0 meaning "scan the first 16384 rows", and all other values meaning what they say). Putting this all together, the most reliable way to read a US/Canadian postal code is to use the following registry settings:

    TypeGuessRows = 0

    ImportMixedTypes = Text

    That’s pretty close to perfect, although it will still fail if the first 16384 postal codes are numeric and any of the subsequent ones aren’t.

    This is a Bad Design for so many reasons I don’t know where to start. First, the behavior of the spreadsheet importer should not depend on global registry settings - that is just inviting mysterious, data-dependent errors whenever other applications or users change those settings. All of those settings should be in the connect string and nowhere else. Second, there should be an option to say "I’m not sure what data is coming, but I want all of it - please coerce everything to something universal like an arbitrary-length string". Third, the interface should be stream-based, not file-based. If you are reading the spreadsheet data from the network, you shouldn’t have to save it to a temporary file in order to parse it. Fourth, you shouldn’t have to read the spreadsheet schema if you just want to select the worksheet by index (e.g. you want to read the first worksheet, whatever it happens to be called).

    For an example of a nice interface for reading and writing Excel spreadsheets, check out Jakarta POI (an open source Java library).

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply