Job taking 50 hours to run

Question

Job taking 50 hours to run

mahesh.dasoni

SSCommitted

Points: 1653
More actions
February 10, 2013 at 11:08 pm

#273960

I have a 2008 Server(SAN) which is fetching data from 2005 server (Physical server) through linked server.
Intially both were on SAN and that time the job took 30 mintues to fetch data from 2005 Server but now 2005 server is on Physical Server and the same job is running for 50 hours and it continues to run.
Is there any way through which the job time can be reduced.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1000539 More actions · Answer 1

mahesh.dasoni (2/10/2013)
I have a 2008 Server(SAN) which is fetching data from 2005 server (Physical server) through linked server.
Intially both were on SAN and that time the job took 30 mintues to fetch data from 2005 Server but now 2005 server is on Physical Server and the same job is running for 50 hours and it continues to run.
Is there any way through which the job time can be reduced.

Probably not the answer you want to hear but why not move it back to the SAN?

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
"Change is inevitable... change for the better is not".

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
Intro to Tally Tables and Functions

mahesh.dasoni SSCommitted Points: 1653 More actions · Answer 2

We will be moving to SAN in couple of weeks but till then we cant ignore the job,it has to run.

DB_Newbie2007 SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4438 More actions · Answer 3

Not what you may want to hear, but have you may have to convert the process (temporarily) to use a different methodology, if it is that important?

- Are you using bulk loads?

- What about getting a BCP of the data from the 2005 server, then importing it into the 2008 server?

- How about any sort of replication?

- If they are on the same network or in the same room, what about a dedicated network backbone between the two servers?

I do not believe there is a "magic bullet" to allow the transfer to be much faster (we tried these things years ago), other than changing the process, especially via Linked Server...

Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours (Richard Bach, Illusions)

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1000539 More actions · Answer 4

mahesh.dasoni (2/10/2013)
We will be moving to SAN in couple of weeks but till then we cant ignore the job,it has to run.

Ok... now I'm totally confused. I thought you said it was on a SAN and then you took it off the SAN and that's when the troubles started. My question was, if that's true, why not just put it back to where it was when it ran ok?

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
"Change is inevitable... change for the better is not".

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
Intro to Tally Tables and Functions