December 9, 2004 at 7:15 am
We are tasked with collecting various statistics on our production databases for historical and trending purposes. We have an active/active cluster configuration. For example, we need to capture the average number of users, average memory use per day, buffer cache hit ratio, etc. At first I thought that MOM 2005 could provide this data, but MOM only retains a 2 hour window, not trace logging. Therefore, I think that I'll have to use Window Perf Mon.
When capturing performance monitoring on a cluster, will setting up the trace log on the individual local servers provide inaccurate performance monitoring data?
Any suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks.
Carpe diem!
December 13, 2004 at 8:00 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
December 13, 2004 at 2:40 pm
We capture perfmon data for Active/Passive clusters. For active/active, the only issue i can think about is no. of connection if you have both instances running on the same node. But if you are capturing data from the respective server, i don't see any issues with that.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply